Recommendations For The Handloom Industry

Statement from Ashoke Chatterjee, Former Executive Director, National Institute of Design

Research Findings by Nesar Ahmed

Varanasi Weavers - Support and Regeneration

- Uma Prajapati,
  Upasana


- Rahul Kodkani, Udai

- SOS Children's Village
Ashoke Chatterjee's Briefings:
  • November 2005

  • February 2006

  • April 2007


  • At Craft Revival Trust

    John Ballyn
    Independent Consultant to Cultural Sector Enterprises
    February 21st, 2006


    The Jodhpur Concensus was indeed the precursor to the Salvador, Brazil meeting working towards the establishment of ICCI / CIIC. ILO, UNCTAD, ITC UNESCO and most notably Gilberto Gil, Minister of Culture in Brazil were the driving forces behind that Salvador meeting.

    I agree with Ashoke’s diagnosis of the Indian situation, which, sadly, is not unique. In many countries artisans are dominated and controlled by entrepreneurs, whose prime interest is that the artisans remain unorganised, disadvantaged and submissive. Most associations related to Government support are interested in maximisation of foreign currency as the benchmark of success. Artisans lose out in every way.

    Does not the Crafts Council of India have any leverage with government? A Crafts Council could be an appropriate body to take the task of creating and implementing a programme of protection for cultural heritage. Crafts Revival is another body which might consider taking on this activity. Either of them could research and draft a plan for setting such a department in place. This plan could be presented to World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) as a dramatic project which might tempt them to fund it. If WIPO would put money in then the government of India might be persuaded to put up half as well.

    With regard to participatory schemes for design protection, may I suggest visiting the Anti-Copying in Design (ACID) web site: www.acid.uk.com This is a membership IPP service. It has graduated registration payments for members, determined by the number of workers in the production unit. The lowest fee level is for an individual artisan, upwards to the highest fee for some hundreds of workers.

    This means that membership fees are proportional to income/turnover, being fairer than the standard rates for product protection costs per item. ACID has achieved some notable successes. You could consider a similar body in India. It could be started in Delhi, possibly in collaboration with ACID itself, and be promoted and expanded as demand and interest grows.

    UK artisans with whom I have spoken believe it to be a useful addition to their business practices.




    Sign up
    for our mailing list

     

    OUR SHOP

    -

    Books

    -

    CD

    -

    Gifts

    -

    Bags

    -

    Games

    -

    Paper